JOURNAL ARTICLE · EDITORIAL BRIEF
Development and User Testing of an Online Platform to Deliver School-Based Inclusive Physical Education Solutions: Mixed Methods Study
Sangeetha Mohanraj; Laurie A Malone; Sunkanmi Arogbokun; Lauren Lieberman; Mohanraj Thirumalai
JMIR Human Factors · 7 October 2026
The finding or development
High usability ratings coexisted with navigation and comprehension problems, especially for parents using teacher-oriented terminology. Iterative testing informed interface refinements.
What supports it
Peer-reviewed mixed-methods evaluation: eight teachers and eight parents; remote tasks, usability scales and interviews.
Reviewed: Abstract, methods, results and limitations; supplementary files not reviewed.
Why it matters for design
Compare task observations with questionnaire scores; adapt content when a professional tool gains a lay audience.
Read with this in mind
Small convenience sample, remote testing and no classroom or student outcomes. Some published QUIS subscale means exceed the stated nine-point scale; those scores need clarification and are not relied on here.
Original source
Opens the publisher outside this reading room. If nothing opens, copy the source address below.
Reference tools · Paperpile & more
Using Paperpile? Open the original source above, then use the Paperpile extension to save it to your library. Its inline buttons appear on supported websites.
Paperpile’s browser extension guide (opens an external website)Or download the original reference and import the file into Paperpile, Zotero or EndNote. Check the details against the source before citing.
Citation details are requested from Crossref when you download. The file contains a reference, not the full paper.
DOI: 10.2196/89476
This is the complete UX Observatory brief, not the publisher’s full article. Follow the original source to read the work.