UX ObservatoryDESIGN · RESEARCH · PRODUCT
Weekly newsletterSaved librarySearch

PRACTICE & COMMENTARY · EDITORIAL BRIEF

When should you disclose AI use? The PACED framework

Taylor Dykes
Nielsen Norman Group · 25 September 2026

Free to readUnited States · research synthesis
Loading count…

The finding or development

This practitioner article turns research on reactions to AI disclosure into questions about policy, audiences, context, expectations and the extent of AI involvement.

What supports it

Practitioner synthesis of cited research

Reviewed: Article and its discussion of supporting studies

Why it matters for design

A starting point for designing and testing clear disclosures in AI-enabled products, rather than assuming that one label works for every audience.

Read with this in mind

PACED is a proposed framework, not an independently validated scale. Check the cited experiments and applicable rules before relying on the recommendations.

Original source

Read at source (opens an external website)

Opens the publisher outside this reading room. If nothing opens, copy the source address below.

Reference tools · Paperpile & more

Using Paperpile? Open the original source above, then use the Paperpile extension to save it to your library. Its inline buttons appear on supported websites.

Paperpile’s browser extension guide (opens an external website)

This is the complete UX Observatory brief, not the publisher’s full article. Follow the original source to read the work.

Back to the reading selection · Search again