How claims are supported, how outcomes are measured and where findings stop applying.
12 connections
These are editorial connections by subject, not claims of collaboration, endorsement or equal evidence quality. This first topic collection covers the new AI, robotics, security, interface design and preparation resources; it is not a complete index of the reading room.
Peer-reviewed journal article · 2000 · background · Publisher-indexed abstract reviewed; full text not reviewed
Tractinsky, Katz and Ikar examine relationships between perceptions of an interface’s aesthetics and usability. A starting point for asking how visual presentation influences judgement.
Peer-reviewed journal article · 2012 · background · Publisher-indexed abstract excerpt reviewed; full text not reviewed
Examines the relationship between aesthetics, usability and affect under experimental manipulations. The abstract challenges a simple, one-direction account of beauty determining perceived usability.
Empirical journal article · 2016 · background · NIST abstract reviewed; full text not reviewed here
Stanton and colleagues used semi-structured interviews with 40 participants. Fatigue emerged in participants’ accounts even though it was not an explicit focus of the interview protocol.
Conference proceedings · research discovery · Open USENIX proceedings · collection listing checked
A specialist starting point for usable privacy and security research. Follow individual papers relevant to authentication, privacy decisions and security behaviour.
Distinguishes motion that helps an observer infer a goal from motion that matches expectations when the goal is already known. The paper combines a formal model with experiments involving different kinds of actors.
Introduces 100 simulated household activities, task-state definitions and evaluation metrics, with 500 VR demonstrations as human reference data. The evaluated learning approaches struggled with the benchmark’s complex activities.
Peer-reviewed conference paper · background · Open author manuscript · full text reviewed
A set of 18 guidelines, refined through several evaluation stages, including 49 design practitioners assessing 20 AI-infused products. Useful for examining expectations, correction and user control across an interaction.
Industry empirical report · not peer-reviewed · background · Open report · methods and limitations reviewed
An observational analysis of millions of interactions across Claude Code and API usage. More experienced Claude Code users both enabled more automatic approvals and interrupted more often, suggesting oversight is more complicated than approval frequency alone.